Thursday, 7 October 2021

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

The mono track on the Warner blu-ray uses the same mastering as the mono track on the earliest New Line DVDs, which is good; they sound fine to me. The Image LaserDisc is much dupier, and its poorer fidelity has less to do with the track being analogue than underlying source issues. 

The 5.1 remix has many many new sound effects and sounds worse than the theatrical mix in terms of  fidelity - it's harshly EQed and everything is mixed at nearly the same level.



3 comments:

  1. only issue with the mono track on the blu-ray is that it's too quiet, I have to turn it much louder than the remix

    also I noticed one specific difference in Glen's death, alternate music is used and the original audio for his mom's screams during that scene was accidentally "restored" (her first few screams were dubbed in the original mix for some reason), that's the only instance where I think the remix works better because her screams are much more in sync with the visuals and it didn't sound looped like the original did

    but other than that the original mix is vastly superior in every way

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oh and I almost forgot to mention it's missing some sound effects, like whenever Tina tears of Freddy's face in the opening, the tearing sound is gone in the remix

      the mono track on the 2006 DVD where the remix originated was just a downmix of the remix so it's good Warner listened to complaints about that and restored the true theatrical mix on the blu-ray

      Delete
  2. I've actually come to find out that there are two different remixes for this movie, the 2006 one which is the one you reviewed, and the one from the 1999 DVD which was actually a good remix. It wasn't missing sound effects or music cues, didn't add anything new, and sounded faithful overall. It makes the existence of the 2006 remix all the more frustrating since it didn't need to be created in the first place.

    ReplyDelete